First? Last?
There is another way of looking at what Jesus meant when he said, "The first shall be last and the last shall be first," and that is . . . that there is no such thing as first and last.
Or . . . that they are such transient "places" that their sheer transience renders them irrelevant or obsolete.
Or . . . don't even bother to try and figure out first and last in yourself or in others because you don't have enough information.
Or . . . first and last are too temporal to pay any attention to or put any energy towards.
Or . . . did I say there were many ways of looking at what Jesus said?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home