Saturday, February 11, 2012

First? Last?

There is another way of looking at what Jesus meant when he said, "The first shall be last and the last shall be first," and that is . . .  that there is no such thing as first and last.

Or . . . that they are such transient "places" that their sheer transience renders them irrelevant or obsolete.

Or . . . don't even bother to try and figure out first and last in yourself or in others because you don't have enough information.

Or . . . first and last are too temporal to pay any attention to or put any energy towards.

Or . . . did I say there were many ways of looking at what Jesus said?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home